Updated: 9/3/2004; 9:38:35 AM.
John Robb's Weblog
Thriving on rapid change.
        

Sunday, February 22, 2004

 Karl Rove's favorite person.  There is a case that can be made that zealots like Nader make hay (raise more money, supporters, and media attention) when "a devil" is in office.  So, spoiling the election and putting Bush back in office (again) for another four years is in his self-interest.

BTW:  the American democratic process is designed to drive towards consensus.  The electoral college ensures an independent candidate is nothing but a spoiler to the prospects of the established party it targets. Think!
10:18:31 AM    Comment_ Trackback []


 There is so much disinformation swirling around offshoring/outsourcing issue that it is almost impossible to make an informed decision.  A good way to slice through the muck of the debate is to watch the trade number.  It is the only true measure of national competitiveness.  Over the last decade, our trade deficit has grown by over %1,500 to nearly $500 b in 2003.  Based on this, its little wonder that there is excessive worry about the future of America.

One item that may mitigate the worry about this number is that the US dollar is still on the way down.  This will make American goods and services (and by extension American workers) more competitive.  However, how low will it need to go to stop this amazing growth rate in the deficit?  Can the deficit be reversed through a fall in the dollar?  Unfortunately, the data indicates that it may be in for a big fall before we are competitive globally again.  The dollar has already fallen for two years, but there still is significant growth in the trade deficit (we hit a new record in December). 

One thing to really worry about is that if it takes another 30-40% drop in the dollar to make us competitive again, what will the OPEC nations do?  They sell their oil for dollars (which is very good for the US since it makes the dollar a reserve currency).  IF the dollar drops that much, will OPEC bolt?  Given that they could get 50% more for their product if they sell it in Euros, they might.  That would be a disaster (it would cause huge inflationary pressures in the US).

Don't worry about the details of offshoring/outsourcing.  The real worry is whether or not the US's lack of competitiveness in trade will translate into a loss of the dollars role as a reserve currency.  My question:  how do we balance the trade deficit without tarriffs or a massive fall in the dollar? 

One way was proposed by Warren Buffett late last year (Fortune:  premium content, I can send the article to you if you want) is market-based import credits.  He was so convinced the dollar was going to drop markedly (knowing the returns he expects, he anticipates the dollar will drop 30-40% over the next two to three years) he bet against the dollar and America for the first time in his life.  Here's how it would work.  Every dollar of export would award a dollar of "import credit" to the exporter.  These import credits would then be sold in the market to any company that wanted to export to the US.  This would zero out the balance of trade, force Americans to live within their means, and provide the US an opportunity to regain its competitiveness.   However, at what cost??
10:09:07 AM    Comment_ Trackback []


 Virginia Postrel makes the case that the gap between the unemployment household survey and the enterprise survey is the explosion of employment (much of it part-time and gray zone employment) in lifestyle industries.  How is this dynamic Virginia?  The elevation of personal service work (nannies, massage therapists, manicurists, etc.) to an exciting job of the future is another sign of the new Victorianism sweeping the country.
9:40:24 AM    Comment_ Trackback []

© Copyright 2004 John Robb.
 
February 2004
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29            
Jan   Mar

Navigation